Salt vs yallo: Mobile plans, internet & TV – a comprehensive comparison of the two providers
Salt and yallo are two important Swiss mobile providers. Both offer subscriptions in the areas of mobile telephony, internet, and TV. However, they differ in their approach as well as in the network they use.
Alongside Swisscom and Sunrise, Salt is one of Switzerland’s three main network operators. The provider yallo uses the network of its parent company, Sunrise. Network coverage for both providers is at a very high level throughout Switzerland.
The differences between the two providers lie less in network quality and more in pricing structures, tariff models, additional services, customer approach, and overall user experience. The goal of this comparison is to help you find the provider and mobile plan that best matches your personal usage behavior.
yallo vs Salt: How do the providers differ in terms of costs, offerings, and value for money?
This comparison is not intended to declare one provider better or worse, but rather to explain the different approaches of the two companies. The following table provides an overview of where each provider’s strengths lie:
yallo positions itself as a digital-first secondary brand of Sunrise, focusing on simple tariff structures, frequent long-term promotions, and flexible contract models. It primarily targets price-conscious users who value transparent pricing, unlimited data options, and straightforward mobile plans, while also offering selected TV and home internet subscriptions..
More about yallo
Salt stands out with competitive pricing, generous data allowances, and extensive roaming options. Many plans offer strong performance at a comparatively lower price point, making Salt especially attractive for heavy data users, frequent travelers, and price-conscious customers.
More about SaltOverview of Mobile Plan Details
The following table provides an overview of how the mobile networks of yallo and Salt compare:
| Aspect | yallo | Salt |
|---|---|---|
| 🏷️ Brand positioning | Digital secondary brand of Sunrise | Full network operator |
| 📄 Contract models | Flexible, frequent promotions | Broad portfolio incl. bundled offers |
| 🔥 Promotions & discounts | Very frequent (long-term deals as promotions) | Many discounts |
| ➕ Additional services | Focus mainly on mobile, but also TV & home internet | Full-service provider for mobile, internet & TV |
| 💰 Price level | Mid-range segment | Broad portfolio |
Comparison of mobile plans by user type
Which provider and which mobile or internet plan is best for you depends on how you intend to use your subscription. Everyone has different preferences and criteria.

Heavy data users (streaming, gaming, using the phone as a hotspot)
Users who frequently stream or browse the internet on their smartphones are well served by many of Salt’s mobile plans. These plans are generally performance-oriented and generously structured, often including unlimited data with high fair-use limits.
yallo offers plans with unlimited data and many included countries, while standing out with particularly affordable mobile plans.
The difference lies less in data volume or speed and more in pricing and additional services. Customers who value extra services and certain add-ons (such as special roaming options) tend to choose Salt.
Frequent travelers & commuters
Salt offers extensive roaming packages (e.g. for the EU, USA, and worldwide), making travel more convenient. Salt differentiates roaming into four zones: Europe, Travel, World, and Far.
yallo also offers attractive plans with roaming options, though with fewer international add-on packages. yallo also defines roaming across four different zones. You can find detailed information on individual plans in our mobile plan comparison.
Within Switzerland, there are slight differences for commuters: In the CHIP network test on long-distance trains, the Salt network achieved a score of 1.39, while Sunrise scored 1.49 (note: the German grading system was used, where “1” is the best grade).
Plans for price-conscious users
This is where yallo shines with its often very low promotional prices. Both providers offer plans without a minimum contract term.
Mobile plans for occasional users
Both providers offer plans for light users. yallo impresses with simple, clearly calculated mobile plans. If the plan does not include unlimited calls or data, usage is billed per minute or per unit, with customers paying for their actual usage at the end of the month.
Salt also offers entry-level plans for low usage, though fees tend to be slightly higher.

Families & households
Families and larger households appreciate bundled offers such as Salt Home (internet + TV). In addition, multiple SIM cards can be managed under one account with Salt.
yallo is the younger of the two brands (founded in 2005), but it also offers TV and home internet subscriptions. In alao’s internet plan comparison, you can see which offers are currently available from each provider.
| Category | yallo | Salt |
|---|---|---|
| 🌐 Internet performance | Very good | Very good |
| 📶 Mobile performance | Very good | Very good |
| 📺 TV service | Very limited | Various options |
| ⚡ Activation time | 1–3 business days | 1–3 business days |
| 🤝 Customer service | Digital-first | Phone support & in-store service |
| 🧑💻 User experience | Very simple | More comprehensive |
| 🧾 Billing | Clear, minimalist | Detailed |
Billing – real user experience
Billing also differs slightly between the two providers. yallo focuses on compact, minimal invoices, while Salt provides more detailed bills. Both providers operate on a monthly billing cycle.
For questions or issues, yallo directs customers to an online contact form. Salt customers can speak directly with customer service via hotline or visit local shops. Overall, Salt appears slightly more customer-oriented in this area.
Salt and yallo network coverage
The question of which network yallo uses has already been answered: it operates on the Sunrise network. Both Salt’s network coverage and yallo’s coverage via Sunrise are at a very high level. 5G coverage exceeds 95% for both providers, while 4G reaches more than 99.9% of the population.
Regional network coverage comparison
There are minor regional differences in Switzerland:
- Urban areas: Very strong 4G & 5G coverage for both providers
- Suburban areas: Stable performance, hardly any differences
- Highways & major transport routes: Consistently good coverage
- Rural areas: Solid 4G coverage, with 5G slightly weaker in some areas
In concrete figures:
| yallo (Sunrise) | Salt | |
|---|---|---|
| 5G in cities | 96.98% | 96.48% |
| 5G outside cities | 87.03% | 86.42% |
| 5G on 3.6 GHz (Band N78) | 82.39% | 81.26% |
| 4G | over 99.9% | over 99.9% |
yallo vs Salt: What speed scores do the mobile plans offer?
In terms of speed, both providers perform at a high level. The following table shows where slight differences appear:
| Metric | yallo | Salt |
|---|---|---|
| 🚀 Overall speed score | approx. 108 | approx. 110 |
| ⬇️ Avg. download speed | approx. 56–58 Mbps | approx. 57–60 Mbps |
| ⬆️ Avg. upload speed | approx. 15–16 Mbps | approx. 15–16 Mbps |
| 🎬 Video experience score | approx. 66–68 | approx. 67–69 |
| 📺 Typical video quality | Full HD | Full HD |
| ⏳ Buffering / interruptions | Rare | Rare |
| 📡 Avg. latency (ping) | approx. 32–35 ms | approx. 31–34 ms |
| 🎮 Game experience score | Good | Good |
| 💬 Voice app experience | approx. 80–82 | approx. 81–83 |
| 📞 Video call stability | High | High |
Salt vs yallo: What users say about their plans
Based on user feedback from forums and independent comparison portals, yallo is frequently praised for its low prices. Salt customers highlight the broad product portfolio and the many roaming and add-on options.

Conclusion: Summary of strengths
In summary, yallo offers ideal plans for price-conscious users who value simple and transparent tariffs.
Salt is better suited for users who want more extensive options and place greater value on service access. The table below provides a final comparison:
| Criterion | yallo | Salt |
|---|---|---|
| 💰 Price level | Medium | Medium |
| 🎯 Ideal for | Budget & mobile + home | Mobile + home |
| ⭐ Main advantages | Promotions, flexibility | Add-ons, service |
| ✨ Extra features | Promotions | TV, internet |
| 📦 Data volume | Unlimited available | Unlimited available |
| ⚡ Speed (4G / 5G) | Very good | Very good |
| 🌍 Roaming | EU & worldwide, 4 zones | EU & worldwide, 4 zones |
| 📄 Contract term | 0 or 24 months | 0 or 24 months |
| ➕ Additional fees | Rare | Rare |
| 🤝 Customer service | Digital | Multichannel |
| ⚡ Activation | 1–3 days | 1–3 days |
| 🧑💻 User experience | Rather simple | More extensive add-ons |
By the way, both providers also offer home internet plans. In our internet plan comparison, you’re sure to find a suitable option for fast browsing and streaming at home.